At its annual review, the Harbourfront Charitable Foundation tells its manager it must now pay HK$80 million for a hospital wing within two years, far earlier than planned. Which step of the investment management process should the manager revisit first?
A large, near-term payout changes the foundation's constraints: it now has a liquidity need and a much shorter time horizon for part of the money. In the investment management process, the review stage feeds back to the first step, so the manager revisits the objectives and constraints, then the strategy and asset allocation that follow from them. Performance attribution explains past returns and does not address a new spending need. Swapping securities within an unchanged strategic mix leaves the mismatch in place. Adding equities to a two-year need raises the risk of a shortfall rather than reducing it. Source: Standard investment management process (planning, execution and feedback); investment policy statement practice (as at October 2026).
Jumping to the portfolio. A change in the client's circumstances goes back to the objectives first; everything else follows from them.
Practise more Paper 12 The investment management process questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public HKSI Paper 12 syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by HKSI Institute or the SFC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.