Through two broker accounts held for the same fund, Celia Ho sells and buys 400,000 shares of a small listed company on the Exchange at a price above the last trade. The fund's beneficial ownership never changes, and the share price rises. Which statement is correct?
Price rigging includes entering into a sale or purchase of securities that involves no change in beneficial ownership and has the effect of maintaining, increasing, reducing, stabilising or causing fluctuations in the price of securities traded on a recognized market (s.275(1)(a)). No intention needs to be proved for this limb; the person escapes only by establishing that creating a false or misleading appearance about the price was not among the purposes (s.275(4)). On-exchange execution is no answer, an intention to induce others belongs to stock market manipulation (s.278), and the trades are real market transactions, not bookkeeping. The same trades are also presumed false trading (s.274(5)(a)). Source: SFO (Cap. 571) s.274(5)(a), s.275(1)(a), (4), s.278 (as at October 2026).
Expecting the SFC to prove intent. For a wash sale that moves the price, the burden shifts to the person to establish an innocent purpose.
Practise more Paper 6 Misconduct questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public HKSI Paper 6 syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by HKSI Institute or the SFC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.