Harbourfront Group's treasury company pools money contributed by bona fide employees of group companies, and by their spouses, and manages it as one fund, paying them returns without giving them day-to-day control. How is this treated under Schedule 1 to the SFO?
The arrangement meets paragraph (a) of the 'collective investment scheme' definition in Part 1 of Schedule 1: no day-to-day control, pooled contributions and returns from the property. But exclusion (iii) removes arrangements under which each participant is a bona fide employee or former employee of a corporation in the same group as the operator, or a spouse, widow, widower, minor child or minor step-child of such an employee. So the paragraph (a) elements are not the only tests. Spouses are expressly within the exclusion. Whether the operator holds a Type 9 licence has nothing to do with the exclusion. Source: SFO (Cap. 571) Sch. 1 Pt 1 s.1, definition of 'collective investment scheme', para (a) and exclusion (iii) (as at October 2026).
Candidates apply the three CIS elements and stop. The definition has a list of exclusions, and group employee schemes are one of them.
Practise more Paper 1 The Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public HKSI Paper 1 syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by HKSI Institute or the SFC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.