Harbourview Securities Ltd is licensed for Type 1 regulated activity only. When taking orders by phone, its representatives tell clients which Hong Kong stocks look like good buys, for brokerage only and purely to support dealing. What is the licensing position for this advice?
Under the definitions in Schedule 5 to the SFO, as summarised in the SFC Licensing Handbook (July 2025) para 1.3.4, a Type 1 licensee need not also be licensed for Type 4 (or Types 6 and 9) where that activity is carried on wholly incidental to its securities dealing business. Advice given as a subordinate part of dealing, with no separate fee, fits that exemption. Saying every stock recommendation needs Type 4 ignores the incidental carve-out. Recommending stocks is advising, not asset management, so Type 9 is the wrong activity. The SFO draws no distinction between spoken and written advice for this purpose. Source: SFO (Cap. 571) Sch. 5 Pt 2 (definition of advising on securities); SFC Licensing Handbook (July 2025) para 1.3.3-1.3.4 (as at October 2026).
Candidates assume any stock tip triggers Type 4. The test is whether the advice is subordinate to dealing and not a distinct, separately charged service.
Practise more Paper 1 Licensing, registration and subsidiary legislation questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public HKSI Paper 1 syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by HKSI Institute or the SFC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.