Lok Fu Industries Ltd, an unlisted company, has an article allowing documents to be sent to members by website. On 2 March it individually asks Mr Tam to agree to website delivery, clearly stating the effect of not replying. He never replies. When may he be treated as having agreed?
Under s.833(4) of Cap. 622 a member is regarded as having agreed to website communication if the articles (or a members' resolution) allow it, the company has individually asked the member, the request clearly stated the effect of not responding, and no response arrives within 28 days beginning on the date the request was sent. A repeat request for the same class of documents may not be sent within 12 months of the last one. Fourteen days is not the statutory period. Signed express consent is not the only route for an unlisted company, and no special resolution is needed where the articles already allow website delivery. Source: Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) s.833(3)-(4) (as amended by the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2025, in force 17 April 2025) (as at October 2026).
Candidates think silence can never be consent; Cap. 622 deems agreement after 28 days if the request warned of that effect.
Practise more Paper 1 Hong Kong law and the Companies Ordinance questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public HKSI Paper 1 syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by HKSI Institute or the SFC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.